DUI Attorney

“Seizure occurs only if, in view of all of circumstances surrounding incident, reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave.” Lawson v. State, 120 Md.App. 610, 707 A.2d 947 Md.App.,1998. 

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

 “Activation of emergency lights on police patrol vehicle was show of authority that constituted seizure, where suspect complied with assertion of authority and stopped his vehicle.” Lawson v. State, 120 Md.App. 610, 707 A.2d 947 Md.App.,1998.

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“It is more than a mere accosting when police attempt to detain suspect for questioning through use of police power and suspect submits; approach then becomes seizure and must be justified by reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.” Lawson v. State, 120 Md.App. 610, 707 A.2d 947 Md.App.,1998. 

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“Seizure does not occur when law enforcement officers attempt to stop suspect who fails to comply with either show of authority or application of physical force.” Lawson v. State, 120 Md.App. 610, 707 A.2d 947 Md.App.,1998. 

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“Ordinarily, approaching parked vehicle to question occupants about their identity and actions is a mere accosting and not a seizure.” Lawson v. State, 120 Md.App. 610, 707 A.2d 947 Md.App.,1998. 

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“Where sheriff stated he would take former prisoner into custody if sure he had authority, and new sheriff had assumed duties, propriety of mandamus need not be considered.” Hopkins v. North, 151 Md. 553, 135 A. 367 Md. 1926. 

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“Election of new sheriff and his assumption of duties held matter of judicial knowledge.” Hopkins v. North, 151 Md. 553, 135 A. 367 Md. 1926. 

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“Prisoner released on void order must serve sentence, though time within which it should have been served has expired.” Hopkins v. North, 151 Md. 553, 135 A. 367 Md. 1926.

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“Neither magistrate nor sheriff has authority to release prisoner serving sentence who becomes ill.” Hopkins v. North, 151 Md. 553, 135 A. 367 Md. 1926.

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

“It was improper for the same judge who presided over a motorist’s district court trial to preside over the motorist’s trial de novo in circuit court on appeal from the district court decision.” Brooks v. State, 312 Md. 115, 538 A.2d 316 Md.,1988.

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.

SRIS Law Group P.C.

If you need legal counsel, then contact the DUI attorneys at the law offices of SRIS Law Group, PC, to speak with a DUI lawyer in your area.